A Multi-Site Survey Study on the Association Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and United States Anesthesiology Residents' Mental Health.

BACKGROUND:  At the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, anesthesiology residency programs were impacted differently due to various factors such as the local severity of COVID-19, exposure to patient suffering, and inability to complete rotations. We sought to investigate the impact of local-level pandemic severity on the well-being of anesthesiology residents. METHODS:  This multi-site study surveyed postgraduate year two residents from 15 United States (US) anesthesiology programs using the Perceived Stress Scale, Mini-Z, Patient Health Questionnaire-9,WHO-5 Well-Being Index,and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support before the pandemic (baseline survey) and during the first COVID-19 surge (post survey). RESULTS:  A total of 144 (65%) residents responded to the initial baseline survey; 73 (33%) responded to the post survey, and 49 (22%) completed both surveys. There was not a statistically significant difference in any well-being outcomes of participants between the surveys, nor was there a significant difference based on the severity of COVID-19 impact at the program's hospital. Male participants had higher perceived stress scores (ß = 4.05, 95%CI: 0.42, 7.67, P = 0.03) and lower social support from family (ß = -6.57, 95%CI: -11.64, -1.51, P = 0.01) at the post survey compared to female participants after controlling for baseline scores. Additionally, married participants or those with domestic partners reported higher perceived social support in the post survey (ß = 5.79, 95%CI: -0.65, 12.23, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION:  The local COVID-19 severity at a residency program did not disproportionately impact well-being scores among anesthesiology residents. Those most vulnerable to diminished well-being appeared to be male and single participants. As a result, targeted well-being interventions, including those aiming to increase social support, to higher-risk resident groups may be indicated. Future work is needed to assess the longstanding COVID-19 pandemic impacts on resident well-being.

Features and risk factors of post-COVID-19 syndrome: findings from a longitudinal study in Bangladesh.

Background: A comprehensive study of the post-COVID syndrome (PCS) remains scarce in low-and middle-income countries. We assessed the prevalence, incidence rate, evolution over time, and risk factors of PCS among hospitalized (HS) and non-hospitalized (NHS) COVID-19 survivors. Methods: We undertook a prospective longitudinal study of COVID-19 survivors at months 1, 3, and 5 post-discharge or post-isolation period. The study was conducted at two COVID-19-designated hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, between December 2020 and October 2021. Findings: 362 participants were enrolled in the study; the median time from the onset of COVID-19 to enrolment was 57 days (IQR 41, 82). At enrolment, after adjusting for potential confounders, the HS more often had one or more symptoms, peripheral neuropathy (PN), depression and anxiety disorder, poor quality of life, dyspnea, tachycardia, restrictive lung disease on spirometry, anemia, proteinuria, and need for insulin therapy than the non-hospitalized group (95% CI > 1 for all). Although most of these findings decreased significantly over time in HS, PN increased in both groups. The incidence of diabetes was 9.8/1000 person-month, and the new requirement of insulin therapy was higher (aOR, 6.71; 95% CI, 2.87, 15.67) among HS than the NHS. Older age, being female, comorbidity, cigarette smoking, hospitalization, and contact with COVID-19 cases were independently associated with PCS. Interpretation: We observed a high burden of PCS in hospitalized and non-hospitalized survivors despite most findings' decreasing trend over time. Our results underscore the importance of continuing long-term follow-up and subsequent management. Funding: The United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Health and nutritional status of children hospitalized during the COVID-19 pandemic, Bangladesh.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the health and nutrition of children younger than 5 years admitted to hospital during and before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Bangladesh. METHODS: We collected data from hospital records of children 0-59 months admitted to the Dhaka Hospital of the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh in March 2020-February 2021 (COVID-19 period; n = 2552) and March 2019-February 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period; n = 6738). Data collected included sociodemographic, anthropometric, clinical and biochemical characteristics. We compared these data for child admissions in the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 periods, including infants 0-11 months born during and before the pandemic and admitted to hospital. FINDINGS: Admissions of children as a percentage of total admissions were lower in March 2020 (2.47%; 63/2552) than March 2019 (8.30%; 559/6738), but increased to 20.61% (526/2552) in February 2021, three times greater than in the pre-COVID-19 period (6.69%; 451/6738). Children admitted during the COVID-19 period were significantly more likely to have dehydration, severe sepsis or septic shock, convulsions, hypernatraemia and raised creatinine than children admitted before the pandemic (P < 0.05). In infants < 6 months and those born during the pandemic, stunting and wasting were significantly higher than in infants in the pre-COVID-19 period (P < 0.05). The risk of death was higher in infants < 6 months during the pandemic (odds ratio: 1.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-2.92). CONCLUSION: During the pandemic, children presented with more severe illness and poorer nutrition. Efforts are needed to reduce the adverse effects of the pandemic on the health and well-being of children.